PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Rossi, Remo
AU  - Hampel, David
TI  - Indirect Cost in Should Cost Calculations - How Carmaker's Cost Engineers See It
DP  - 2024 Jun 30
TA  - European Journal of Business Science and Technology
PG  - 96--106
VI  - 10
IP  - 1
AID - 10.11118/ejobsat.2024.006
IS  - 23366494
AB  - In a world of intense competition, automotive manufacturers are continually increasing their outsourcing activities and, as a result, automotive companies have built extensive cost engineering departments within their organisations. Staff in these units provide Should Cost Calculations for externally manufactured components, which are utilized as supplier targets to support buyers in fact-based negotiations. This paper aims to explore potential differences in the direct and indirect cost categories in the context of Should Cost Calculations. Based on a sample survey among cost engineers, it was possible to determine differences in cost knowledge, risk of suppliers concealing unjustified costs, level of analytical detail, and suitability to conduct fact-based negotiations depending on the length of job experience, industry, and especially the type of costs. The evaluation is carried out through analysis of variance, and a contingency table homogeneity test, and the results are presented using correspondence maps. The results show significant differences between the direct and indirect cost categories, including a higher risk of cost hiding and a lower suitability for price negotiations for the indirect cost category.